
Our Theory of Change
Identified Problems
-
There is a significant knowledge gap about the AI supply chain and its socio-environmental impacts.
The AI supply chain remains poorly understood, with limited awareness of its full lifecycle—from resource extraction to disposal—and the socio-environmental harms embedded within it. This lack of transparency prevents informed decision-making and collective action toward accountability.
-
Communities affected by resource extraction for AI systems are excluded from decisions that affect their lives.
The communities most impacted by AI’s resource extraction, manufacturing, and waste are systematically marginalized in governance processes, leaving their voices unheard and their rights unprotected in the development and regulation of AI systems.
-
Policy frameworks on AI ethics ignore environmental justice and more-than-human perspectives.
Existing AI governance models fail to integrate principles of environmental and social justice, perpetuating structural inequities and ecological harm while prioritizing market growth and technological innovation.
-
The planetary justice impacts of AI systems are invisible and unmeasured.
There are no standardized frameworks or methodologies to evaluate the environmental and social costs of AI systems. This invisibility enables harmful practices and shields corporations and governments from accountability.
-
Dominant AI narratives prioritize growth and techno-solutionism.
Prevailing narratives about AI focus on growth, innovation, and techno-solutionism, often ignoring the relational and justice-centered perspectives that are essential to addressing its ecological and social impacts.
What We Do
-
Conduct interdisciplinary research to map the AI supply chain and its socio-environmental impacts.
Publish accessible reports and visual tools that illuminate the lifecycle of AI systems.
Host educational campaigns to raise awareness among policymakers, researchers, and the general public.
-
Partner with local organizations to amplify the lived experiences of affected communities.
Facilitate participatory workshops and storytelling initiatives to center community voices.
Advocate for inclusive governance practices that prioritize community consent and input.
-
Conceptualize a planetary justice approach to AI.
Develop policy briefs advocating for planetary justice-centered approaches to AI governance.
Conduct campaigns reframing AI governance to include planetary justice.
-
Develop the AI Supply Chain Impact Framework to assess socio-environmental costs across the AI lifecycle.
Pilot the framework with real-world data to ensure feasibility and impact.
Publish and share the framework for adoption by businesses, regulators, and researchers.
-
Produce accessible media (blogs, podcasts, zines) critiquing techno-solutionism and advocating for relational, justice-based perspectives.
Collaborate with artists and activists to create multimedia projects reframing AI narratives.
Host public dialogues and events to foster critical conversations about AI and planetary justice.
Outputs & Outcomes
-
Outputs
Comprehensive reports detailing the AI supply chain and its impacts.
Infographics and visual tools explaining the lifecycle and its consequences.
Online and offline educational campaigns to disseminate findings.
Outcomes
Greater public and institutional understanding of the AI supply chain.
Policymakers and businesses equipped with data to implement justice-oriented governance.
Increased visibility of hidden socio-environmental harms within AI systems.
-
Outputs
Community-driven narratives and multimedia materials (e.g., videos, zines, blogs).
Policy briefs highlighting community-centered recommendations.
Partnerships with grassroots organizations to support ongoing advocacy.
Outcomes
Empowered communities with platforms to influence AI governance.
Policymakers integrating community voices into regulatory frameworks.
Strengthened alliances between affected communities and advocacy networks.
-
Outputs
Policy briefs and advocacy materials on eco-social AI governance.
Collaborative partnerships with governance bodies and advocacy organizations.
Public awareness campaigns to challenge dominant AI governance narratives.
Outcomes
Policymakers adopting eco-social justice principles in AI governance frameworks.
AI policies reflecting environmental and social justice concerns.
Broader institutional commitment to equitable and sustainable AI governance.
-
Outputs
AI Supply Chain Impact Framework with specific metrics and indicators.
Pilot project report with actionable insights.
Scalable methodology for standardized assessment of AI impacts.
Outcomes
Adoption of the framework by businesses and governments.
Increased accountability and transparency in AI lifecycle practices.
A global standard for evaluating the socio-environmental impacts of AI systems.
-
Outputs
Blogs, podcasts, zines, and multimedia projects reframing AI narratives.
Public events and workshops engaging diverse audiences.
Observatory of Planetary Justice Impacts of AI to track and highlight key issues.
Outcomes
Public discourse shifts toward recognizing eco-social accountability in AI development.
Growing movement advocating for justice-centered AI systems.
Expanded public engagement with and understanding of alternative AI narratives.